We Chase Romantic, But Are We Missing the Bigger Picture? 

 
A gentle exploration of why romantic relationships often feel central, how attachment theory shapes this pull, and why a wider constellation of bonds creates deeper emotional security. 
 
If you imagine your relationships as a constellation, you may notice how often romantic love shines the brightest. Many people grow up believing that this one bond should offer the deepest sense of safety, stability, and meaning. 

But attachment theory, a psychological framework explaining how early caregiver bonds shape our emotional patterns ,suggests that the instinct to place romance at the centre begins long before we even understand what love is. 

And when we step back and look at the whole sky, we begin to see how many other relationships hold us quietly, steadily, and just as powerfully. 

 

Why Romance Becomes the Centre of Our Emotional Sky 

John Bowlby’s work on attachment theory explains that the earliest connections we form teach the nervous system what safety feels like. As infants, we looked to caregivers as our emotional anchors. 

As adults, many people naturally shift this anchoring role to romantic partners. 

This is why romantic conflict may feel heavier than disagreements in any other relationship. 
Research by Pietromonaco and Barrett (2013) suggests that the body may echo old attachment patterns through its stress responses. It is almost as if the nervous system remembers what closeness once meant and reacts before we consciously understand it. 

Romance feels central not because we imagined it that way, but because our biology was shaped to treat deep attachment as essential. 

But if biology sets the foundation, culture strengthens its gravity.  
 

Why Society Teaches Us to Orbit Romance Above All Else 
 
Even before people experience romance themselves, they grow up around stories that place it at the centre of a meaningful life. 

Films, families, and social narratives regularly present romantic relationships as the main source of fulfilment, identity, and emotional safety. 

Psychologists like Mikulincer and Shaver describe how these cultural expectations position romance as the bond responsible for meeting a wide range of emotional needs. 

When this message repeats across homes, media, and communities, it becomes easy to believe that one romantic relationship must hold the emotional weight of an entire life. 

But attachment science offers a wider and more generous understanding of human security. 

 

Why Our Constellation Is Much Larger Than Romance 

 
Attachment does not belong to romantic love alone. 
Bowlby emphasised that humans form emotional bonds with many figures over a lifetime. 

Here are some examples of anchors that matter just as deeply: 

• • Friends who show up consistently. 

• • Siblings who share our history. 

• • Mentors who guide our growth. 

• • Chosen families who offer acceptance. 

• • Colleagues who create psychological safety. 

• • Neighbours who bring familiarity. 

• • Community groups that build belonging. 

• • Spiritual guides who offer grounding. 

• • Teachers who feel steady. 

• • Pets whose presence soothes the nervous system. 

Each of these relationships forms another star in the constellation that helps us feel anchored. 

These bonds may not carry the same cultural intensity as romance. But they still offer a sense of safety that is equally meaningful. They share the emotional load when one relationship cannot do everything. Together, they create a network of steady connections that support us through uncertainty, transition, and change. 

 

Why One Sun Cannot Carry an Entire Sky 
 

Romantic partners often become the centre because many people are taught to make them the centre. 
But when one relationship is expected to offer reassurance, validation, intimacy, stability, and emotional regulation, it begins to hold more weight than any single bond can sustain. 

Hazan and Shaver describe this overload as an "attachment load", the emotional pressure placed on a relationship when it becomes the only anchor. 

The solution is not to make romance smaller. 
The solution is to recognise that humans were never meant to rely on a single source for all their warmth. 

 

Why a Multi-Anchor Constellation Makes Us More Secure 

 

A secure attachment system is built through many reliable relationships, not one. 

When: 

• friendships offer steadiness, 

• families give continuity, 

• communities create belonging, 

• work relationships build trust, 

• and romance adds depth— 

no single bond becomes overloaded. 

This makes romantic love richer and less fragile. 
It becomes one meaningful connection among many, instead of the place where every emotional need must be met. When all anchors hold their rightful place, security grows not from one star, but from a whole sky of connection. 

 

 

Authoritativeness Note 
 
This article is informed by established attachment frameworks, including: 
- John Bowlby’s Attachment Theory 
- Research on adult attachment and emotional attunement 
- Pietromonaco & Barrett (2013): Does Attachment Get Under the Skin? Adult Romantic Relationships, Attachment, and HPA-Axis Responses — which explores how attachment patterns influence the body’s stress response 
 
- Contemporary findings on adult attachment and resilience 

This piece offers general psychoeducation and reflection, not a substitute for therapy. 

 

If you ever feel the need to explore these patterns with support, iDare’s Support & Engage Spaces offer inclusive, accessible mental-health guidance whenever you need it. 


Image Credits: UnSplash